Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. ACM will no longer require disclosure of the use of #generativeAI in writing papers.... an absolutely terrible change by the @ACM Publications Board to the Policy on Authorship.

ACM will no longer require disclosure of the use of #generativeAI in writing papers.... an absolutely terrible change by the @ACM Publications Board to the Policy on Authorship.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
generativeaiaislop
21 Indlæg 15 Posters 29 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • cbecker@hci.socialC cbecker@hci.social

    Just last year, the same ACM's late CEO Vicki L. Hanson selected and invited some of us to discuss what computing's responsibility for climate change is and develop guidance for @ACM policy. In the resulting report, we said that "computing’s purpose within a strategy for tackling climate change must be reimagined." (See the report for more.)

    Is ACM going to be part of this reimagination? 🤷‍♂️

    https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagMan.11.1.1

    cbecker@hci.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
    cbecker@hci.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
    cbecker@hci.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #5

    What I do know is that these conversations to reimagine computing for ecological and just futures ARE taking place and that people have inspiring ideas, wonderful collaborations and fabulous results to share, including - among others - at #LIMITS2026 in two weeks, proudly independent of ACM and free to attend, everywhere at once 🙂

    https://computingwithinlimits.org/2026/

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • nyhan@fediscience.orgN nyhan@fediscience.org

      @cbecker @ACM
      I don't see how the highlighted bit makes sense

      cbecker@hci.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
      cbecker@hci.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
      cbecker@hci.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #6

      @nyhan

      oh but we can't possibly be expected to keep track of what we do with our computers when we produce ten papers each week!

      /s

      khinsen@scholar.socialK 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • cbecker@hci.socialC cbecker@hci.social

        ACM will no longer require disclosure of the use of #generativeAI in writing papers.... an absolutely terrible change by the @ACM Publications Board to the Policy on Authorship.

        Yes, this will give ACM more papers. No, the ideology of "number go up" productivism is not the path to responsible, ecological or ethical computing, but to irrelevance. #AIslop

        profg@mastodon.acm.orgP This user is from outside of this forum
        profg@mastodon.acm.orgP This user is from outside of this forum
        profg@mastodon.acm.org
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #7

        @cbecker @ACM

        Damn...now thinking of changing instances. The amount of "AI“ posts I've seen definitely went up over h years, but to give level footing with actual authors? I disaree.

        profg@mastodon.acm.orgP 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • nyhan@fediscience.orgN nyhan@fediscience.org

          @cbecker @ACM
          I don't see how the highlighted bit makes sense

          nyhan@fediscience.orgN This user is from outside of this forum
          nyhan@fediscience.orgN This user is from outside of this forum
          nyhan@fediscience.org
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #8

          @cbecker @ACM

          How would expecting authors to disclose use of LLMs in their work "limit" their use of AI?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • profg@mastodon.acm.orgP profg@mastodon.acm.org

            @cbecker @ACM

            Damn...now thinking of changing instances. The amount of "AI“ posts I've seen definitely went up over h years, but to give level footing with actual authors? I disaree.

            profg@mastodon.acm.orgP This user is from outside of this forum
            profg@mastodon.acm.orgP This user is from outside of this forum
            profg@mastodon.acm.org
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #9

            @cbecker @ACM

            Related...

            https://mastodon.social/@VeroniqueB99/116728232111465723

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • cbecker@hci.socialC cbecker@hci.social

              ACM will no longer require disclosure of the use of #generativeAI in writing papers.... an absolutely terrible change by the @ACM Publications Board to the Policy on Authorship.

              Yes, this will give ACM more papers. No, the ideology of "number go up" productivism is not the path to responsible, ecological or ethical computing, but to irrelevance. #AIslop

              davecb@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
              davecb@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
              davecb@hachyderm.io
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #10

              @cbecker @ACM Suicidal. I wrote for the CACM and for Queue. I'm going to pitch a series to Queue... but I assumed it would be written by humans, from human memory.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • cbecker@hci.socialC cbecker@hci.social

                ACM will no longer require disclosure of the use of #generativeAI in writing papers.... an absolutely terrible change by the @ACM Publications Board to the Policy on Authorship.

                Yes, this will give ACM more papers. No, the ideology of "number go up" productivism is not the path to responsible, ecological or ethical computing, but to irrelevance. #AIslop

                frankhghtwr@meow.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                frankhghtwr@meow.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                frankhghtwr@meow.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #11

                @cbecker @ACM And I just read something similar from the APA. I legitimately feel sick 🤮

                https://apastyle.apa.org/blog/cite-generative-ai-references

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • cbecker@hci.socialC cbecker@hci.social

                  ACM will no longer require disclosure of the use of #generativeAI in writing papers.... an absolutely terrible change by the @ACM Publications Board to the Policy on Authorship.

                  Yes, this will give ACM more papers. No, the ideology of "number go up" productivism is not the path to responsible, ecological or ethical computing, but to irrelevance. #AIslop

                  knutson_brain@sfba.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                  knutson_brain@sfba.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                  knutson_brain@sfba.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #12

                  @cbecker @ACM
                  #slopotomy

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • cbecker@hci.socialC cbecker@hci.social

                    ACM will no longer require disclosure of the use of #generativeAI in writing papers.... an absolutely terrible change by the @ACM Publications Board to the Policy on Authorship.

                    Yes, this will give ACM more papers. No, the ideology of "number go up" productivism is not the path to responsible, ecological or ethical computing, but to irrelevance. #AIslop

                    jbiserkov@mas.toJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    jbiserkov@mas.toJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    jbiserkov@mas.to
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #13

                    @cbecker @ACM
                    Don't worry. Soon most employeers will mandate the use of "a one", as the US education secretary calls it.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • cbecker@hci.socialC cbecker@hci.social

                      ACM will no longer require disclosure of the use of #generativeAI in writing papers.... an absolutely terrible change by the @ACM Publications Board to the Policy on Authorship.

                      Yes, this will give ACM more papers. No, the ideology of "number go up" productivism is not the path to responsible, ecological or ethical computing, but to irrelevance. #AIslop

                      ifnotnow@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                      ifnotnow@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                      ifnotnow@mastodon.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #14

                      @cbecker @ACM
                      And ACM will reap what it sows

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • cbecker@hci.socialC cbecker@hci.social

                        ACM will no longer require disclosure of the use of #generativeAI in writing papers.... an absolutely terrible change by the @ACM Publications Board to the Policy on Authorship.

                        Yes, this will give ACM more papers. No, the ideology of "number go up" productivism is not the path to responsible, ecological or ethical computing, but to irrelevance. #AIslop

                        sreycoyrehourcq@social.sciences.reS This user is from outside of this forum
                        sreycoyrehourcq@social.sciences.reS This user is from outside of this forum
                        sreycoyrehourcq@social.sciences.re
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #15

                        @cbecker @ACM cc @khinsen

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • cbecker@hci.socialC cbecker@hci.social

                          ACM will no longer require disclosure of the use of #generativeAI in writing papers.... an absolutely terrible change by the @ACM Publications Board to the Policy on Authorship.

                          Yes, this will give ACM more papers. No, the ideology of "number go up" productivism is not the path to responsible, ecological or ethical computing, but to irrelevance. #AIslop

                          curtosis@lingo.lolC This user is from outside of this forum
                          curtosis@lingo.lolC This user is from outside of this forum
                          curtosis@lingo.lol
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #16

                          @cbecker @ACM They were only 15-20 years late to open access, not terribly surprising their understanding of scholarship has not changed.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • cbecker@hci.socialC cbecker@hci.social

                            ACM will no longer require disclosure of the use of #generativeAI in writing papers.... an absolutely terrible change by the @ACM Publications Board to the Policy on Authorship.

                            Yes, this will give ACM more papers. No, the ideology of "number go up" productivism is not the path to responsible, ecological or ethical computing, but to irrelevance. #AIslop

                            jens@social.finkhaeuser.deJ This user is from outside of this forum
                            jens@social.finkhaeuser.deJ This user is from outside of this forum
                            jens@social.finkhaeuser.de
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #17

                            @cbecker @ACM After about 20 years or so, it might be time to cancel my membership.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • cbecker@hci.socialC cbecker@hci.social

                              ACM will no longer require disclosure of the use of #generativeAI in writing papers.... an absolutely terrible change by the @ACM Publications Board to the Policy on Authorship.

                              Yes, this will give ACM more papers. No, the ideology of "number go up" productivism is not the path to responsible, ecological or ethical computing, but to irrelevance. #AIslop

                              mirabilos@toot.mirbsd.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                              mirabilos@toot.mirbsd.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                              mirabilos@toot.mirbsd.org
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #18

                              @ACM @cbecker "AI" collaboration machinery?

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • cbecker@hci.socialC cbecker@hci.social

                                ACM will no longer require disclosure of the use of #generativeAI in writing papers.... an absolutely terrible change by the @ACM Publications Board to the Policy on Authorship.

                                Yes, this will give ACM more papers. No, the ideology of "number go up" productivism is not the path to responsible, ecological or ethical computing, but to irrelevance. #AIslop

                                fgbjr@indieweb.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                fgbjr@indieweb.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                fgbjr@indieweb.social
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #19

                                @cbecker @ACM The much maligned SciGen project was ahead of its time.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • cbecker@hci.socialC cbecker@hci.social

                                  @nyhan

                                  oh but we can't possibly be expected to keep track of what we do with our computers when we produce ten papers each week!

                                  /s

                                  khinsen@scholar.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                  khinsen@scholar.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                  khinsen@scholar.social
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #20

                                  @cbecker @nyhan Whoever wrote that policy has perhaps never written a paper. Writing is an integral part of doing research.

                                  How about developing dedicated tools for uncritical writing-related tasks such as spell checking? And not call them AI? They would then *automatically* be outside of the scope of AI policies. A simple and smart move! We should have thought of this long ago.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • cbecker@hci.socialC cbecker@hci.social

                                    ACM will no longer require disclosure of the use of #generativeAI in writing papers.... an absolutely terrible change by the @ACM Publications Board to the Policy on Authorship.

                                    Yes, this will give ACM more papers. No, the ideology of "number go up" productivism is not the path to responsible, ecological or ethical computing, but to irrelevance. #AIslop

                                    jpaulgibson@mastodon.ieJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                    jpaulgibson@mastodon.ieJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                    jpaulgibson@mastodon.ie
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #21

                                    @cbecker as the result of such a policy, i wonder how many regular reviewers for acm journals/conferences will refuse to do this task. it will be at least one (counting myself).

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • jwcph@helvede.netJ jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
                                    Svar
                                    • Svar som emne
                                    Login for at svare
                                    • Ældste til nyeste
                                    • Nyeste til ældste
                                    • Most Votes


                                    • Log ind

                                    • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                    • Login or register to search.
                                    Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                    Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                    • First post
                                      Last post
                                    0
                                    • Hjem
                                    • Seneste
                                    • Etiketter
                                    • Populære
                                    • Verden
                                    • Bruger
                                    • Grupper