Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Some after coffee thoughts on the collapse of U.S. - Canada trade talks.

Some after coffee thoughts on the collapse of U.S. - Canada trade talks.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
mastodoncanadacanpolitariffs
54 Indlæg 31 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • paulbusch@cosocial.caP paulbusch@cosocial.ca

    Other legislation that should be passed immediately is the Digital Services Tax, legislation that was canceled in order to foster good relations in the trade talks. That sure worked. Pass it immediately and make U.S. tech pay taxes in Canada for profits made from servicing Canadians.
    There should also be increased export duties on anything the U.S. still needs - aluminum, oil, electric power, potash, etc. Build a fund from these taxes and use it to support other industries with fewer options.

    dero_10@thecanadian.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
    dero_10@thecanadian.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
    dero_10@thecanadian.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #28

    @PaulBusch We should stop building American data centers and jump onboard with Europe on the new non American credit card they are designing.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • paulbusch@cosocial.caP paulbusch@cosocial.ca

      The reference to the "last minute changes in the U.S. proposed terms" is typical Trump. He talked about the tactic in his book, Art of the Deal (that he didn't write), where you get close to a deal and then throw something outrageous onto the table. His deals are not good for both sides, standard practice for achieving stable longterm partnerships, but must be an overwhelming win. He has to dominate the partner in order to feel he is winning. Canada was never going to get a fair deal.

      norawickham@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
      norawickham@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
      norawickham@mastodon.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #29

      It's interesting how some negotiation tactics can prioritize winning over collaboration. A deal's true strength often lies in the balance of interests, rather than one side's dominance.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • maverick604@mastodon.socialM maverick604@mastodon.social

        @PaulBusch I know I sound like a broken record at this point but a) turn off their power b) nationalize our oil (and energy is general) and c) wait 24 hrs. There’s no point in negotiating in good faith with a neighbour that has already shown they disregard their contracts at a moments notice. SHOW them that we mean business, and in the words of some clown I can’t remember at the moment “we hold all the cards”. When the lights go off in NY or CA they’ll be negotiating right quick.

        8r3n7@mstdn.ca8 This user is from outside of this forum
        8r3n7@mstdn.ca8 This user is from outside of this forum
        8r3n7@mstdn.ca
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #30

        @maverick604 @PaulBusch Shouldn't we be cautious with actions that might be interpreted as "acts of war"?

        I would put nothing past the current US administration. I hope I am wrong. Everything they do backfires, but they keep making awful destructive choices. Because, really, it only hurts their nation, not the actual leadership. Emulating Putin and similar arrogant fools.

        Fortunately, their military is a bit exhausted from stupidity in Iran. Still, they have other options for abuse. Renditions for every Canadian in the US? Revokation of all visas? What if they pressure US entertainment companies to cut of all distribution in Canada? What if they shut off access to the US Internet? etc. etc.

        I am curious what we can tolerate, and what we will have to tolerate, before things get better.

        paulbusch@cosocial.caP maverick604@mastodon.socialM 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • hub@cosocial.caH hub@cosocial.ca

          @PaulBusch and repeal the copyright extension that was part of CUSMA.

          owlyph@cosocial.caO This user is from outside of this forum
          owlyph@cosocial.caO This user is from outside of this forum
          owlyph@cosocial.ca
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #31

          @hub @PaulBusch That would be fantastic... even if that copyright extension was maintained it could have been/can be implemented differently (optional renewals rather than automatic), in favour of more public access.

          hub@cosocial.caH 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • 8r3n7@mstdn.ca8 8r3n7@mstdn.ca

            @maverick604 @PaulBusch Shouldn't we be cautious with actions that might be interpreted as "acts of war"?

            I would put nothing past the current US administration. I hope I am wrong. Everything they do backfires, but they keep making awful destructive choices. Because, really, it only hurts their nation, not the actual leadership. Emulating Putin and similar arrogant fools.

            Fortunately, their military is a bit exhausted from stupidity in Iran. Still, they have other options for abuse. Renditions for every Canadian in the US? Revokation of all visas? What if they pressure US entertainment companies to cut of all distribution in Canada? What if they shut off access to the US Internet? etc. etc.

            I am curious what we can tolerate, and what we will have to tolerate, before things get better.

            paulbusch@cosocial.caP This user is from outside of this forum
            paulbusch@cosocial.caP This user is from outside of this forum
            paulbusch@cosocial.ca
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #32

            @8r3n7 @maverick604

            While everything is possible, I think our government should respond and expect what is likely. Yes, Americans and the opposition government haven't really reacted aggressively to Trump's more moronic policies or statements (like invading Greenland) but even Trump's puppets know they can't go too far. Any extreme policy the U.S. implements in retaliation is likely to trigger a more vocal or violent civil disobedience, which Republicans will want to avoid.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • cjmoorehead@techhub.socialC cjmoorehead@techhub.social

              @PaulBusch Cory Doctorow (@pluralistic) proposed a brilliant retaliatory strategy by hitting the US where it really hurts — digital rights management. Here's his article on the topic via the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives: https://www.policyalternatives.ca/news-research/what-if-canada-stopped-upholding-u-s-tech-companies-intellectual-property/ #cdnpoli #tariffs

              lemgandi@mastodon.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
              lemgandi@mastodon.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
              lemgandi@mastodon.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #33

              @cjmoorehead @PaulBusch @pluralistic

              Gee, I am an American citizen and all I can say is:

              Throw me in that briar patch!!

              ( TCP/IP does not respect international borders. What are they gonna do, sue me? )

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • owlyph@cosocial.caO owlyph@cosocial.ca

                @hub @PaulBusch That would be fantastic... even if that copyright extension was maintained it could have been/can be implemented differently (optional renewals rather than automatic), in favour of more public access.

                hub@cosocial.caH This user is from outside of this forum
                hub@cosocial.caH This user is from outside of this forum
                hub@cosocial.ca
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #34

                @owlyph @PaulBusch Also they should repeal the part of the copyright act that preempt Canadian rights with DRM. That section, put up by Harper, was to placate the US tech.

                Make Canada the capital if phone unlock and compatible ink cartridges.

                caffeinatedgeek@thecanadian.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • hub@cosocial.caH hub@cosocial.ca

                  @owlyph @PaulBusch Also they should repeal the part of the copyright act that preempt Canadian rights with DRM. That section, put up by Harper, was to placate the US tech.

                  Make Canada the capital if phone unlock and compatible ink cartridges.

                  caffeinatedgeek@thecanadian.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                  caffeinatedgeek@thecanadian.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                  caffeinatedgeek@thecanadian.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #35

                  @hub louder for those in the back!!!

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • paulbusch@cosocial.caP paulbusch@cosocial.ca

                    The reference to the "last minute changes in the U.S. proposed terms" is typical Trump. He talked about the tactic in his book, Art of the Deal (that he didn't write), where you get close to a deal and then throw something outrageous onto the table. His deals are not good for both sides, standard practice for achieving stable longterm partnerships, but must be an overwhelming win. He has to dominate the partner in order to feel he is winning. Canada was never going to get a fair deal.

                    paulbusch@cosocial.caP This user is from outside of this forum
                    paulbusch@cosocial.caP This user is from outside of this forum
                    paulbusch@cosocial.ca
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #36

                    Apparently this was the "last minute demand".

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • paulbusch@cosocial.caP paulbusch@cosocial.ca

                      Thinking about retaliation. Applying reciprocal #Tariffs is the stated next step. That will raise prices for us and makes it more important than ever to #BuyCanadian. Our government needs to work on a strict labeling law that makes it easy to identify Canadian products, and stop importers from #MapleWashing their goods. Push that legislation through immediately.

                      #TeamCanada

                      newstik@social.heise.deN This user is from outside of this forum
                      newstik@social.heise.deN This user is from outside of this forum
                      newstik@social.heise.de
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #37

                      @PaulBusch And there have to be fines for mislabeling. All supermarkets in my town constantly mislabel produce that is really from the US.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • paulbusch@cosocial.caP paulbusch@cosocial.ca

                        The reference to the "last minute changes in the U.S. proposed terms" is typical Trump. He talked about the tactic in his book, Art of the Deal (that he didn't write), where you get close to a deal and then throw something outrageous onto the table. His deals are not good for both sides, standard practice for achieving stable longterm partnerships, but must be an overwhelming win. He has to dominate the partner in order to feel he is winning. Canada was never going to get a fair deal.

                        the_turtle@polyglot.cityT This user is from outside of this forum
                        the_turtle@polyglot.cityT This user is from outside of this forum
                        the_turtle@polyglot.city
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #38

                        @PaulBusch see? A lot of us knew he was a dick 50 years ago.

                        Sorry.

                        paulbusch@cosocial.caP 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • the_turtle@polyglot.cityT the_turtle@polyglot.city

                          @PaulBusch see? A lot of us knew he was a dick 50 years ago.

                          Sorry.

                          paulbusch@cosocial.caP This user is from outside of this forum
                          paulbusch@cosocial.caP This user is from outside of this forum
                          paulbusch@cosocial.ca
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #39

                          @the_turtle

                          No need to apologize about facts...

                          the_turtle@polyglot.cityT 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • paulbusch@cosocial.caP paulbusch@cosocial.ca

                            Thinking about retaliation. Applying reciprocal #Tariffs is the stated next step. That will raise prices for us and makes it more important than ever to #BuyCanadian. Our government needs to work on a strict labeling law that makes it easy to identify Canadian products, and stop importers from #MapleWashing their goods. Push that legislation through immediately.

                            #TeamCanada

                            bwacton@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                            bwacton@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                            bwacton@mastodon.social
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #40

                            @PaulBusch it’s a terrible thing to say but the recent fires in BC will drive demand for BC forestry products that will be hard hit in the trade war. A great nation building project would be the rebuilding of the communities destroyed fire.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • paulbusch@cosocial.caP paulbusch@cosocial.ca

                              The reference to the "last minute changes in the U.S. proposed terms" is typical Trump. He talked about the tactic in his book, Art of the Deal (that he didn't write), where you get close to a deal and then throw something outrageous onto the table. His deals are not good for both sides, standard practice for achieving stable longterm partnerships, but must be an overwhelming win. He has to dominate the partner in order to feel he is winning. Canada was never going to get a fair deal.

                              virtuous_sloth@cosocial.caV This user is from outside of this forum
                              virtuous_sloth@cosocial.caV This user is from outside of this forum
                              virtuous_sloth@cosocial.ca
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #41

                              @PaulBusch
                              On the other hand, he might be single-handedly destroying the neo-liberal hegemony promulgated by the USTR for 50 years off the map. So there’s that.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • cjmoorehead@techhub.socialC cjmoorehead@techhub.social

                                @PaulBusch Cory Doctorow (@pluralistic) proposed a brilliant retaliatory strategy by hitting the US where it really hurts — digital rights management. Here's his article on the topic via the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives: https://www.policyalternatives.ca/news-research/what-if-canada-stopped-upholding-u-s-tech-companies-intellectual-property/ #cdnpoli #tariffs

                                leastaction@writing.exchangeL This user is from outside of this forum
                                leastaction@writing.exchangeL This user is from outside of this forum
                                leastaction@writing.exchange
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #42

                                @cjmoorehead @PaulBusch @pluralistic

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • paulbusch@cosocial.caP paulbusch@cosocial.ca

                                  Thinking about retaliation. Applying reciprocal #Tariffs is the stated next step. That will raise prices for us and makes it more important than ever to #BuyCanadian. Our government needs to work on a strict labeling law that makes it easy to identify Canadian products, and stop importers from #MapleWashing their goods. Push that legislation through immediately.

                                  #TeamCanada

                                  ve2uwy@mastodon.radioV This user is from outside of this forum
                                  ve2uwy@mastodon.radioV This user is from outside of this forum
                                  ve2uwy@mastodon.radio
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #43

                                  @PaulBusch

                                  The tit-for-tat tariff thing makes no sense to me.

                                  “You raised the price your people pay for our products so … we’re gonna raise the price our people pay for *your* stuff! Ha! Gotcha! #ThereIFixedItEh.”

                                  paulbusch@cosocial.caP 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • cjmoorehead@techhub.socialC cjmoorehead@techhub.social

                                    @PaulBusch Cory Doctorow (@pluralistic) proposed a brilliant retaliatory strategy by hitting the US where it really hurts — digital rights management. Here's his article on the topic via the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives: https://www.policyalternatives.ca/news-research/what-if-canada-stopped-upholding-u-s-tech-companies-intellectual-property/ #cdnpoli #tariffs

                                    darkathena@beige.partyD This user is from outside of this forum
                                    darkathena@beige.partyD This user is from outside of this forum
                                    darkathena@beige.party
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #44

                                    @cjmoorehead @oldredsubby @PaulBusch @pluralistic Please do. US tech steals everything.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • ve2uwy@mastodon.radioV ve2uwy@mastodon.radio

                                      @PaulBusch

                                      The tit-for-tat tariff thing makes no sense to me.

                                      “You raised the price your people pay for our products so … we’re gonna raise the price our people pay for *your* stuff! Ha! Gotcha! #ThereIFixedItEh.”

                                      paulbusch@cosocial.caP This user is from outside of this forum
                                      paulbusch@cosocial.caP This user is from outside of this forum
                                      paulbusch@cosocial.ca
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #45

                                      @VE2UWY

                                      In general, I agree. But as @RantingCanuck points out, it can be done strategically where Canadians are impacted less, and encouraged to #BuyCanadian.

                                      https://mstdn.ca/@RantingCanuck/117139272426606523

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • paulbusch@cosocial.caP paulbusch@cosocial.ca

                                        Other legislation that should be passed immediately is the Digital Services Tax, legislation that was canceled in order to foster good relations in the trade talks. That sure worked. Pass it immediately and make U.S. tech pay taxes in Canada for profits made from servicing Canadians.
                                        There should also be increased export duties on anything the U.S. still needs - aluminum, oil, electric power, potash, etc. Build a fund from these taxes and use it to support other industries with fewer options.

                                        drewdaniels@mastodon.onlineD This user is from outside of this forum
                                        drewdaniels@mastodon.onlineD This user is from outside of this forum
                                        drewdaniels@mastodon.online
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #46

                                        @PaulBusch a new digital services tax would be an escalation unless it was done simultaneously with the US. It would be quite bad for a lot of Canadian jobs.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • cjmoorehead@techhub.socialC cjmoorehead@techhub.social

                                          @PaulBusch Cory Doctorow (@pluralistic) proposed a brilliant retaliatory strategy by hitting the US where it really hurts — digital rights management. Here's his article on the topic via the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives: https://www.policyalternatives.ca/news-research/what-if-canada-stopped-upholding-u-s-tech-companies-intellectual-property/ #cdnpoli #tariffs

                                          drewdaniels@mastodon.onlineD This user is from outside of this forum
                                          drewdaniels@mastodon.onlineD This user is from outside of this forum
                                          drewdaniels@mastodon.online
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #47

                                          @cjmoorehead @PaulBusch @pluralistic https://www.iprdaily.com/article/index/18262.html while it could be effective, it’s an escalation.
                                          Arguably the US is hurt by their current respect for the IP system, even the big multinationals. https://www.iprdaily.com/article/index/18262.html is an example showing h.266 is majority owned by patents of China companies.
                                          The US backing out of TPP left many IP protection laws as needing to be done bilaterally, and I’m not sure how much has been done since CPTPP excluded them.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper