Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Age verification ...

Age verification ...

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
privacyprivacymattersageverificationsocialmediasurveillance
45 Indlæg 20 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • gullok@mastodon.socialG gullok@mastodon.social

    @Nawer_Rapter @joho how is age related with sexual orientation?

    iju@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
    iju@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
    iju@mastodon.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #24

    @gullok @Nawer_Rapter @joho

    They're not asking solely age. Remember that the drive to ask for IDs is led by Meta. They're using this platform partly to divert blame, but also part to increase the accuracy of their profiles. Which everyone has, as Facebook has cookies on vast majority of websites, not just their own.

    Second, they're not asking age solely on sites intended for kids, but on places where people would talk of their politics and preferences. Such as, say, gay person in Russia.

    gullok@mastodon.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • davey_cakes@mastodon.ieD davey_cakes@mastodon.ie

      @gullok @joho

      gullok@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
      gullok@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
      gullok@mastodon.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #25

      @davey_cakes @joho your argument is pretty broad, like this is about having all of your life data somehow being uploaded (fun fact, big tech already does a pretty good job with this for profit).

      but at the same time it is pretty clear that fascism can pop up out of nowhere and then such data could be brutally misused indeed.

      davey_cakes@mastodon.ieD 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • iju@mastodon.socialI iju@mastodon.social

        @gullok @Nawer_Rapter @joho

        They're not asking solely age. Remember that the drive to ask for IDs is led by Meta. They're using this platform partly to divert blame, but also part to increase the accuracy of their profiles. Which everyone has, as Facebook has cookies on vast majority of websites, not just their own.

        Second, they're not asking age solely on sites intended for kids, but on places where people would talk of their politics and preferences. Such as, say, gay person in Russia.

        gullok@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
        gullok@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
        gullok@mastodon.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #26

        @iju @Nawer_Rapter @joho if Meta is behind this, then it is really problematic

        iju@mastodon.socialI 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • joho@mastodon.onlineJ joho@mastodon.online

          Age verification ...

          #privacy #privacymatters #ageverification #socialmedia #surveillance #dataskydd #dataprotection #gdpr #deepstate

          aarparca@beige.partyA This user is from outside of this forum
          aarparca@beige.partyA This user is from outside of this forum
          aarparca@beige.party
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #27

          @joho Good Lord. I'm so ready to reduce both my screen and internet time significantly.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • gullok@mastodon.socialG gullok@mastodon.social

            @iju @Nawer_Rapter @joho if Meta is behind this, then it is really problematic

            iju@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
            iju@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
            iju@mastodon.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #28

            @gullok @Nawer_Rapter @joho

            It is. This isn't about pedofiles per se, but that kids are using Meta's services before they're of minimum age (iirc 13...16 depending on location). As Meta's services are repeatedly proven to be bad for mental health by design (as happy people don't spend monies), they can't fix the root cause.

            So instead of overhauling their systems to be healthy, they're trying to get everyone to give them their IDs.

            It's essentially the same discussion as with tobacco.

            gullok@mastodon.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • pecet@f3d1.euP pecet@f3d1.eu

              @joho Scan your face or upload id if you have different political opinions than ruling party.

              elexia@catcatnya.comE This user is from outside of this forum
              elexia@catcatnya.comE This user is from outside of this forum
              elexia@catcatnya.com
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #29

              @pecet @joho actually having non-approved opinions has been banned. -5000 social credit, please check in at the local reeducation center.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • joho@mastodon.onlineJ joho@mastodon.online

                Age verification ...

                #privacy #privacymatters #ageverification #socialmedia #surveillance #dataskydd #dataprotection #gdpr #deepstate

                mrose@universeodon.comM This user is from outside of this forum
                mrose@universeodon.comM This user is from outside of this forum
                mrose@universeodon.com
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #30

                @joho

                anonymizing money (crypto) = good
                anonymizing people (privacy) = bad

                huh????

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • iju@mastodon.socialI iju@mastodon.social

                  @gullok @Nawer_Rapter @joho

                  It is. This isn't about pedofiles per se, but that kids are using Meta's services before they're of minimum age (iirc 13...16 depending on location). As Meta's services are repeatedly proven to be bad for mental health by design (as happy people don't spend monies), they can't fix the root cause.

                  So instead of overhauling their systems to be healthy, they're trying to get everyone to give them their IDs.

                  It's essentially the same discussion as with tobacco.

                  gullok@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                  gullok@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                  gullok@mastodon.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #31

                  @iju @Nawer_Rapter @joho argh, but then, if we imagine that they would revamp their system to be healthy, vulnerables would just migrate to another addictive platform. I would like to see this kind of algorithm effect being forbidden for social media somehow

                  nawer_rapter@mastodon.socialN 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • gullok@mastodon.socialG gullok@mastodon.social

                    @davey_cakes @joho your argument is pretty broad, like this is about having all of your life data somehow being uploaded (fun fact, big tech already does a pretty good job with this for profit).

                    but at the same time it is pretty clear that fascism can pop up out of nowhere and then such data could be brutally misused indeed.

                    davey_cakes@mastodon.ieD This user is from outside of this forum
                    davey_cakes@mastodon.ieD This user is from outside of this forum
                    davey_cakes@mastodon.ie
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #32

                    @gullok @joho

                    One of the problems the new approach causes is that there are a lot of people, who neither of us would consider criminals, who have gone to great lengths to try and remain safe, and this breaks that for them.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • joho@mastodon.onlineJ joho@mastodon.online

                      Age verification ...

                      #privacy #privacymatters #ageverification #socialmedia #surveillance #dataskydd #dataprotection #gdpr #deepstate

                      happyborg@fosstodon.orgH This user is from outside of this forum
                      happyborg@fosstodon.orgH This user is from outside of this forum
                      happyborg@fosstodon.org
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #33

                      @joho and let us brick anyone's phone

                      ... if the London Met Police get their way.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • joho@mastodon.onlineJ joho@mastodon.online

                        Age verification ...

                        #privacy #privacymatters #ageverification #socialmedia #surveillance #dataskydd #dataprotection #gdpr #deepstate

                        danish_akhtar7@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                        danish_akhtar7@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                        danish_akhtar7@mastodon.social
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #34

                        @joho

                        We are heading towards a Dystopian Surveillance society with no privacy rights.

                        joho@mastodon.onlineJ 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • danish_akhtar7@mastodon.socialD danish_akhtar7@mastodon.social

                          @joho

                          We are heading towards a Dystopian Surveillance society with no privacy rights.

                          joho@mastodon.onlineJ This user is from outside of this forum
                          joho@mastodon.onlineJ This user is from outside of this forum
                          joho@mastodon.online
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #35

                          @danish_akhtar7 I'm afraid we're already there, the rest is just theory (IMHO).

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • gullok@mastodon.socialG gullok@mastodon.social

                            @iju @Nawer_Rapter @joho argh, but then, if we imagine that they would revamp their system to be healthy, vulnerables would just migrate to another addictive platform. I would like to see this kind of algorithm effect being forbidden for social media somehow

                            nawer_rapter@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                            nawer_rapter@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                            nawer_rapter@mastodon.social
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #36

                            @gullok @iju @joho Probably the most reliable way and correct way to read all this issue is through the lenses of "if it is problematic for children,it can be problematic for everyone, and thus requires a solution to a problem, rather than a vet of the entire topic"
                            The true issue at hand here is: gambling mechanisms to get money, and segregation to get money.
                            The true problem to solve is that the way the world we built pays better for optimizing evil than anything else
                            Sex is it's another story

                            nawer_rapter@mastodon.socialN gullok@mastodon.socialG 2 Replies Last reply
                            0
                            • nawer_rapter@mastodon.socialN nawer_rapter@mastodon.social

                              @gullok @iju @joho Probably the most reliable way and correct way to read all this issue is through the lenses of "if it is problematic for children,it can be problematic for everyone, and thus requires a solution to a problem, rather than a vet of the entire topic"
                              The true issue at hand here is: gambling mechanisms to get money, and segregation to get money.
                              The true problem to solve is that the way the world we built pays better for optimizing evil than anything else
                              Sex is it's another story

                              nawer_rapter@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                              nawer_rapter@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                              nawer_rapter@mastodon.social
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #37

                              @gullok @iju @joho the excuse of sex, most of the time (if not the entire time) is used to specifically harm two communities: women who have found a kind of work that is safer than it's previous iterations (webcam prostitution vs actual physical prostitution) and queer people. The queers has always been the primary target for saying "kids should never have ever any knowledge about sex or they turn queer and evil and queer and non-christian". Just change "sex" for "queer" and boom, all logical.

                              nawer_rapter@mastodon.socialN 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • joho@mastodon.onlineJ joho@mastodon.online

                                Age verification ...

                                #privacy #privacymatters #ageverification #socialmedia #surveillance #dataskydd #dataprotection #gdpr #deepstate

                                ratsammich@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                ratsammich@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                ratsammich@mastodon.social
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #38

                                @joho
                                And then harmful sites suddenly incude anything content that doesnt fit the oppressive christian nationalist worldview or corpo agenda. It is just a dangerous slide into total censorship.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • joho@mastodon.onlineJ joho@mastodon.online

                                  Age verification ...

                                  #privacy #privacymatters #ageverification #socialmedia #surveillance #dataskydd #dataprotection #gdpr #deepstate

                                  crisps@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                  crisps@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                  crisps@mastodon.social
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #39

                                  @joho It does make sense for the first two tho. Or am I wrong?

                                  joho@mastodon.onlineJ 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • joho@mastodon.onlineJ joho@mastodon.online

                                    Age verification ...

                                    #privacy #privacymatters #ageverification #socialmedia #surveillance #dataskydd #dataprotection #gdpr #deepstate

                                    renardboy@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                    renardboy@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                    renardboy@mastodon.social
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #40

                                    @joho Hopefully if this happens tor usage will kick up and people will just start hosting their websites as hidden services.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • crisps@mastodon.socialC crisps@mastodon.social

                                      @joho It does make sense for the first two tho. Or am I wrong?

                                      joho@mastodon.onlineJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                      joho@mastodon.onlineJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                      joho@mastodon.online
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #41

                                      @crisps I think that's part of the problem. We, as a society, have failed to keep up with the rapid development of privacy intrusive billion dollar corporations (and government agencies) who, at their core, exploit human rights, such as the right to privacy.

                                      Now the legislative branches and governments are trying to pretend they have a solution to a very difficult problem.

                                      This is a double edged sword, to say the least.

                                      (IMHO, of course)

                                      crisps@mastodon.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • nawer_rapter@mastodon.socialN nawer_rapter@mastodon.social

                                        @gullok @iju @joho the excuse of sex, most of the time (if not the entire time) is used to specifically harm two communities: women who have found a kind of work that is safer than it's previous iterations (webcam prostitution vs actual physical prostitution) and queer people. The queers has always been the primary target for saying "kids should never have ever any knowledge about sex or they turn queer and evil and queer and non-christian". Just change "sex" for "queer" and boom, all logical.

                                        nawer_rapter@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                        nawer_rapter@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                        nawer_rapter@mastodon.social
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #42

                                        @gullok @iju @joho The duality of sex being both a taboo and a thing that everyone does leads to very confusing nonsensical things.What I would call "mystification" (make it obscure but with a lot of silent rules), akin to religious practices from secretive cults. Just on a global scale.
                                        The relationship of children, teenagers and younger people with sex is currently as contradictory as I explained above and only harms them. Demystifying sex is probably the first step to solve that.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • nawer_rapter@mastodon.socialN nawer_rapter@mastodon.social

                                          @gullok @iju @joho Probably the most reliable way and correct way to read all this issue is through the lenses of "if it is problematic for children,it can be problematic for everyone, and thus requires a solution to a problem, rather than a vet of the entire topic"
                                          The true issue at hand here is: gambling mechanisms to get money, and segregation to get money.
                                          The true problem to solve is that the way the world we built pays better for optimizing evil than anything else
                                          Sex is it's another story

                                          gullok@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                                          gullok@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                                          gullok@mastodon.social
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #43

                                          @Nawer_Rapter @iju @joho this is a great way to explain the issue!

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper