Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Spotify, already the bane of many podcasters’ existence, has decided to amp things up: Now it’s scouring podcasts to see if any infringe on “literary content.”

Spotify, already the bane of many podcasters’ existence, has decided to amp things up: Now it’s scouring podcasts to see if any infringe on “literary content.”

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
20 Indlæg 17 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • jsnell@zeppelin.flightsJ jsnell@zeppelin.flights

    Spotify, already the bane of many podcasters’ existence, has decided to amp things up: Now it’s scouring podcasts to see if any infringe on “literary content.” It’s already flagged one podcast I host, which reviews/critiques an author’s books one by one, for “infringing” on the book. This is dire.

    jsnell@zeppelin.flightsJ This user is from outside of this forum
    jsnell@zeppelin.flightsJ This user is from outside of this forum
    jsnell@zeppelin.flights
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #7

    Just to follow up on this with some stats:

    The podcast episode in question is 62 minutes long. More than an hour discussing a book.

    Six minutes in, they quote the opening paragraph of the book, a total of 71 words. It takes 20 seconds.

    What are we even doing here?

    vmachiel@mastodon.nlV jsnell@zeppelin.flightsJ donw@mastodon.coffeeD yatil@yatil.socialY ultranurd@tacobelllabs.netU 5 Replies Last reply
    0
    • jsnell@zeppelin.flightsJ jsnell@zeppelin.flights

      Just to follow up on this with some stats:

      The podcast episode in question is 62 minutes long. More than an hour discussing a book.

      Six minutes in, they quote the opening paragraph of the book, a total of 71 words. It takes 20 seconds.

      What are we even doing here?

      vmachiel@mastodon.nlV This user is from outside of this forum
      vmachiel@mastodon.nlV This user is from outside of this forum
      vmachiel@mastodon.nl
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #8

      @jsnell late stage capitalism.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • jsnell@zeppelin.flightsJ jsnell@zeppelin.flights

        Just to follow up on this with some stats:

        The podcast episode in question is 62 minutes long. More than an hour discussing a book.

        Six minutes in, they quote the opening paragraph of the book, a total of 71 words. It takes 20 seconds.

        What are we even doing here?

        jsnell@zeppelin.flightsJ This user is from outside of this forum
        jsnell@zeppelin.flightsJ This user is from outside of this forum
        jsnell@zeppelin.flights
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #9

        Also I guess I need to clear this up - I am hosting the files for someone else's show on my network. It's not my podcast, but it's on my network so I get the legal notices.

        steveriggins@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • jsnell@zeppelin.flightsJ jsnell@zeppelin.flights

          Just to follow up on this with some stats:

          The podcast episode in question is 62 minutes long. More than an hour discussing a book.

          Six minutes in, they quote the opening paragraph of the book, a total of 71 words. It takes 20 seconds.

          What are we even doing here?

          donw@mastodon.coffeeD This user is from outside of this forum
          donw@mastodon.coffeeD This user is from outside of this forum
          donw@mastodon.coffee
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #10

          @jsnell *stares in LLM training* Those words on a podcast are the problem, all right.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • moltz@mastodon.socialM moltz@mastodon.social

            @dmoren @jsnell I’m sure the authors and publishers don’t want people talking about their books. … Wait.

            jdechko@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
            jdechko@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
            jdechko@mastodon.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #11

            @Moltz @dmoren @jsnell The first rule of book club is you do not talk about book club.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • jsnell@zeppelin.flightsJ jsnell@zeppelin.flights

              Also I guess I need to clear this up - I am hosting the files for someone else's show on my network. It's not my podcast, but it's on my network so I get the legal notices.

              steveriggins@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
              steveriggins@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
              steveriggins@mastodon.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #12

              @jsnell I fear it will only get worse as fewer and fewer disconnected rich people buy corporations and install rules that do nothing but protect their profits. And by “protect” I fully mean insane fantasy delusional actions.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • jsnell@zeppelin.flightsJ jsnell@zeppelin.flights

                Just to follow up on this with some stats:

                The podcast episode in question is 62 minutes long. More than an hour discussing a book.

                Six minutes in, they quote the opening paragraph of the book, a total of 71 words. It takes 20 seconds.

                What are we even doing here?

                yatil@yatil.socialY This user is from outside of this forum
                yatil@yatil.socialY This user is from outside of this forum
                yatil@yatil.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #13

                @jsnell If only the podcasts used the books for "AI" training, that would be totally fine!

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • jsnell@zeppelin.flightsJ jsnell@zeppelin.flights

                  Spotify, already the bane of many podcasters’ existence, has decided to amp things up: Now it’s scouring podcasts to see if any infringe on “literary content.” It’s already flagged one podcast I host, which reviews/critiques an author’s books one by one, for “infringing” on the book. This is dire.

                  jordan@mastodon.subj.amJ This user is from outside of this forum
                  jordan@mastodon.subj.amJ This user is from outside of this forum
                  jordan@mastodon.subj.am
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #14

                  @jsnell ...As they use their users' content to train their own AI systems 🙃

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • jsnell@zeppelin.flightsJ jsnell@zeppelin.flights

                    Spotify, already the bane of many podcasters’ existence, has decided to amp things up: Now it’s scouring podcasts to see if any infringe on “literary content.” It’s already flagged one podcast I host, which reviews/critiques an author’s books one by one, for “infringing” on the book. This is dire.

                    yertle@mastodon.socialY This user is from outside of this forum
                    yertle@mastodon.socialY This user is from outside of this forum
                    yertle@mastodon.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #15

                    @jsnell @siracusa is it going to catch every episode of Recently Read?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • jsnell@zeppelin.flightsJ jsnell@zeppelin.flights

                      Spotify, already the bane of many podcasters’ existence, has decided to amp things up: Now it’s scouring podcasts to see if any infringe on “literary content.” It’s already flagged one podcast I host, which reviews/critiques an author’s books one by one, for “infringing” on the book. This is dire.

                      kierkegaanks@beige.partyK This user is from outside of this forum
                      kierkegaanks@beige.partyK This user is from outside of this forum
                      kierkegaanks@beige.party
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #16

                      @jsnell Jonas Ek is a bit of a latrine

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • moltz@mastodon.socialM moltz@mastodon.social

                        @dmoren @jsnell I’m sure the authors and publishers don’t want people talking about their books. … Wait.

                        maccruiskeen@social.linux.pizzaM This user is from outside of this forum
                        maccruiskeen@social.linux.pizzaM This user is from outside of this forum
                        maccruiskeen@social.linux.pizza
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #17

                        @Moltz @dmoren @jsnell The publicity department where I work is constantly sending out notices to podcasts and reviewers: please do not discuss our books or tell anyone they exist.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • jsnell@zeppelin.flightsJ jsnell@zeppelin.flights

                          Spotify, already the bane of many podcasters’ existence, has decided to amp things up: Now it’s scouring podcasts to see if any infringe on “literary content.” It’s already flagged one podcast I host, which reviews/critiques an author’s books one by one, for “infringing” on the book. This is dire.

                          jason@logoff.websiteJ This user is from outside of this forum
                          jason@logoff.websiteJ This user is from outside of this forum
                          jason@logoff.website
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #18

                          @jsnell I barely remember why I hate Spotify anymore but “they made podcasts stop being podcasts” was DEFINITELY the original sin now that you’ve reminded me. Fuck these scum.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • jsnell@zeppelin.flightsJ jsnell@zeppelin.flights

                            Spotify, already the bane of many podcasters’ existence, has decided to amp things up: Now it’s scouring podcasts to see if any infringe on “literary content.” It’s already flagged one podcast I host, which reviews/critiques an author’s books one by one, for “infringing” on the book. This is dire.

                            V This user is from outside of this forum
                            V This user is from outside of this forum
                            vramvoolenaar@mastodon.nlmakers.ca
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #19

                            @jsnell Awesome. Only AI can get unfettered access to information now.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • jsnell@zeppelin.flightsJ jsnell@zeppelin.flights

                              Just to follow up on this with some stats:

                              The podcast episode in question is 62 minutes long. More than an hour discussing a book.

                              Six minutes in, they quote the opening paragraph of the book, a total of 71 words. It takes 20 seconds.

                              What are we even doing here?

                              ultranurd@tacobelllabs.netU This user is from outside of this forum
                              ultranurd@tacobelllabs.netU This user is from outside of this forum
                              ultranurd@tacobelllabs.net
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #20

                              @jsnell My guess is that Spotify is working on more "make a podcast from this" generative AI features and they are rolling out a Content ID equivalent system to make sure users aren't making whole books into episodes... except they're doing it very stupidly.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • jwcph@helvede.netJ jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
                              Svar
                              • Svar som emne
                              Login for at svare
                              • Ældste til nyeste
                              • Nyeste til ældste
                              • Most Votes


                              • Log ind

                              • Login or register to search.
                              Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                              Graciously hosted by data.coop
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Hjem
                              • Seneste
                              • Etiketter
                              • Populære
                              • Verden
                              • Bruger
                              • Grupper