Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. CONTEXT

CONTEXT

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
petromafiaconsumerism
131 Indlæg 39 Posters 1 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

    @nikatjef @dnkboston @GhostOnTheHalfShell

    so what is your argument? stay on fossil fuels?

    i think you would say no

    and thus do you see the foolishness of this constant insistence on perfectionism?

    obviously EVs result in less fossil fuel use

    that is the point

    we iterate and move to even better, EVs without the problem you describe

    we can't do that until we get off fossil fuels

    that is all we can do: better, then iterate

    stop reading and believing shilled fossil fuel industry arguments

    morgawr@bookstodon.comM This user is from outside of this forum
    morgawr@bookstodon.comM This user is from outside of this forum
    morgawr@bookstodon.com
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #81

    @benroyce @nikatjef @dnkboston @GhostOnTheHalfShell https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0wjyaF8ut_E

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • mark@mastodon.fixermark.comM mark@mastodon.fixermark.com

      @anthropy @GhostOnTheHalfShell @benroyce @blogdiva I've been ruminating as of late on how close Malthusian nihilism is to racism. This is not to cast aspersions or make accusations regarding thread participants; it's just a thought.

      Malthusian math (which is disproven, or at least, claims to prove more than it can because several of its assumptions were upended by new technological breakthroughs) indicates some people have to die or the entire population dies.

      But then you're left with the problem that nobody wants to die, and racism steps in to provide a framework that lets people rank the quality of other human beings to let them square that cognitive dissonance off.

      It may be an interesting dynamic, but I haven't done nearly enough thinking or research on the subject to endorse it as anything more than a thought.

      benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
      benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
      benroyce@mastodon.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #82

      @mark @anthropy @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva

      nihilists on the left are the same as sadists on the right. in the intentional or unintentional effects of their arguments

      if not merely their arguments being slight tweaks on the arguments racist mass murderers make on the right, when you examine the substance of their arguments

      which makes you wonder about such empty turds supposedly "on the left"

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • archaeoiain@archaeo.socialA archaeoiain@archaeo.social

        @jwcph @benroyce @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva it is one reason why we should not encourage people to have children, and should not discourage contraception.

        jwcph@helvede.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
        jwcph@helvede.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
        jwcph@helvede.net
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #83

        @ArchaeoIain @benroyce @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva What the fuck are you talking about!?

        You think we can population control ourselves back to a few hundred million people - and do you think handing out condoms will make it happen fast enough to be ANY help at all in the fight for a better environment on Earth?

        archaeoiain@archaeo.socialA 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

          @nikatjef @dnkboston @GhostOnTheHalfShell

          so what is your argument? stay on fossil fuels?

          i think you would say no

          and thus do you see the foolishness of this constant insistence on perfectionism?

          obviously EVs result in less fossil fuel use

          that is the point

          we iterate and move to even better, EVs without the problem you describe

          we can't do that until we get off fossil fuels

          that is all we can do: better, then iterate

          stop reading and believing shilled fossil fuel industry arguments

          francoisprague@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
          francoisprague@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
          francoisprague@mastodon.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #84

          @benroyce @nikatjef @dnkboston @GhostOnTheHalfShell

          I like to think that 185 millions years from now, when a civilization of octopuses rise, they'll use our human remnants as fuel for their vehicles.

          dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD benroyce@mastodon.socialB 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • paneerakbari@mas.toP paneerakbari@mas.to

            @ChuckMcManis @benroyce @GhostOnTheHalfShell @anthropy @blogdiva Breeder reactors don't output more uranium than what is fed into the system, they make more *fissible* material than they are supplied with

            "Orange juice from concentrate" isn't more oranges than it took to produce

            Our world's matter-system is all but a closed loop, we're not getting - or making - more of it. But our is bombarded by all the energy we could use and we let it just slip away because there's no gold-pressed latinum

            chuckmcmanis@chaos.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
            chuckmcmanis@chaos.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
            chuckmcmanis@chaos.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #85

            @paneerakbari

            Yes, but the point of the Oak Ridge demonstration was a nuclear fuel cycle that ran "forever." Not trying to divert this wonderful discussion, just noting that 'nuclear' can be 'renewable' 😃. I too rage against folks who just want to go back to living in caves with 99% of the current population gone.

            @benroyce @GhostOnTheHalfShell @anthropy @blogdiva

            benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

              @GhostOnTheHalfShell @anthropy @blogdiva

              you're a toxic idealist

              a whiny useless perfectionist

              of course mining for solar and batteries sucks

              *and* a smaller footprint than fossil fuel extraction

              *and* far better for climate change

              you fucking purists are an enemy of the real left as bad as MAGA

              ALL YOU GET IN THIS WORLD IS BETTER

              PERFECT IS NOT ON THE MENU

              are you shilling for the fossil fuel industry or are you just that fucking stupid and blind?

              stop following me, you stupid asshole

              paulc@mstdn.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
              paulc@mstdn.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
              paulc@mstdn.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #86

              @benroyce @GhostOnTheHalfShell @anthropy @blogdiva As to the battery issue, the good news is that lithium batteries are recyclable so over time lithium mining can get greatly reduced once we reach “peak battery.” Recycling batteries could provide a majority of the lithium needed, though there would always be a need for lithium mines.

              Compare to oil which isn't recyclable and always needs to be replaced as we use it.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                @tuban_muzuru @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva

                good

                and thank you

                and now you understand the idiocy of GhostOnTheHalfShell, arguing against that, merely out of toxic idealism

                this marks that account as a shill of the fossil fuel industry or just too fucking stupid to see that the only real world effect of their perfectionist bullshit is to help the fossil fuel industry

                tuban_muzuru@beige.partyT This user is from outside of this forum
                tuban_muzuru@beige.partyT This user is from outside of this forum
                tuban_muzuru@beige.party
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #87

                @benroyce @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva

                @GhostOnTheHalfShell looks at the problem from a kinetic energy perspective. Everything has undeniable conseqences - look at Lake Mead,

                benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • tuban_muzuru@beige.partyT tuban_muzuru@beige.party

                  @benroyce @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva

                  @GhostOnTheHalfShell looks at the problem from a kinetic energy perspective. Everything has undeniable conseqences - look at Lake Mead,

                  benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                  benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                  benroyce@mastodon.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #88

                  @tuban_muzuru @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva

                  right so we get our energy from the sun rather than digging it up. vast improvement

                  tuban_muzuru@beige.partyT 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • francoisprague@mastodon.socialF francoisprague@mastodon.social

                    @benroyce @nikatjef @dnkboston @GhostOnTheHalfShell

                    I like to think that 185 millions years from now, when a civilization of octopuses rise, they'll use our human remnants as fuel for their vehicles.

                    dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
                    dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
                    dnkboston@apobangpo.space
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #89

                    @FrancoisPrague #goals @benroyce @nikatjef @GhostOnTheHalfShell

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • francoisprague@mastodon.socialF francoisprague@mastodon.social

                      @benroyce @nikatjef @dnkboston @GhostOnTheHalfShell

                      I like to think that 185 millions years from now, when a civilization of octopuses rise, they'll use our human remnants as fuel for their vehicles.

                      benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                      benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                      benroyce@mastodon.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #90

                      @FrancoisPrague @nikatjef @dnkboston @GhostOnTheHalfShell

                      thank you, sincerely, for the laugh

                      😆

                      endless dreary nihilism and whiny toxic perfectionism from pinheads is a drag

                      francoisprague@mastodon.socialF 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • drangnon@hachyderm.ioD drangnon@hachyderm.io

                        @benroyce @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva there is also the consideration wrt the effects of vehicle exhaust. Unless the power plants are coal, that's a straight up win for the carbon cycle.

                        Of course the batteries have rare chemicals and extractive companies still come into play. But they are there for vehicles regardless.

                        justinderrick@mstdn.caJ This user is from outside of this forum
                        justinderrick@mstdn.caJ This user is from outside of this forum
                        justinderrick@mstdn.ca
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #91

                        @draNgNon @benroyce @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva Also, EV batteries degrade far less than predicted, and have a valuable ‘second life’ as battery storage for a grid powered by renewables… and when they’re finally used up, they are up to 96% recyclable…. Reducing the need for more extraction.

                        You cannot re-burn gasoline or diesel.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                          @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva

                          unread

                          uninterested

                          another whiny toxic idealist

                          fighting the real left in service of the fossil fuel industry

                          and too fucking stupid to see it

                          stop following me and fuck you, you pathetic loser

                          punissuer@universeodon.comP This user is from outside of this forum
                          punissuer@universeodon.comP This user is from outside of this forum
                          punissuer@universeodon.com
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #92

                          @benroyce might I suggest they may have a point there?
                          https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20240326-how-hydroelectric-dams-are-a-hidden-source-of-carbon-emissions
                          @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva

                          benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • punissuer@universeodon.comP punissuer@universeodon.com

                            @benroyce might I suggest they may have a point there?
                            https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20240326-how-hydroelectric-dams-are-a-hidden-source-of-carbon-emissions
                            @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva

                            benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                            benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                            benroyce@mastodon.social
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #93

                            @punissuer @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva

                            i don't deny that point in the least

                            what i deny is this "well it's better, but it's not perfect, so let's just sit around and whine about being perfect, and thereby only help the status quo of terrible"

                            punissuer@universeodon.comP 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • jwcph@helvede.netJ jwcph@helvede.net

                              @ArchaeoIain @benroyce @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva What the fuck are you talking about!?

                              You think we can population control ourselves back to a few hundred million people - and do you think handing out condoms will make it happen fast enough to be ANY help at all in the fight for a better environment on Earth?

                              archaeoiain@archaeo.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                              archaeoiain@archaeo.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                              archaeoiain@archaeo.social
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #94

                              @jwcph @benroyce @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva That is not what I said. It is the logic of your statement though. It is clear that government policies or even evil religions which encourage population growth and ban contraception are aiming in the opposite direction partly because the dominant economic models are derived from agrarian societies where more people could produce more so growth arose from growing population. Simple really.

                              blogdiva@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • blogdiva@mastodon.socialB blogdiva@mastodon.social

                                RE: https://mastodon.social/@kottke/116013120934445460

                                CONTEXT

                                the Government Pension Fund of Norway is the largest sovereign-wealth fund in the planet; investing over a real, EU trillion in businesses worldwide.

                                where did they get the money to start the fund? FROM SURPLUS PETROLEUM & FOSSIL FUEL REVENUES. Norway nationalized key sectors of their economy, starting with oil & gas.

                                so the Norwegian government uses oil & gas money to rid the country of #petromafia #consumerism thru investments not taxes.

                                take that, neoliberal capitalists.

                                robo105@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                robo105@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                robo105@mastodon.social
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #95

                                @blogdiva Canada had an oil boom at the same time and all the funds raise were wasted by giving it to oil & gas companies

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • jwcph@helvede.netJ jwcph@helvede.net

                                  @ArchaeoIain @benroyce @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva What the fuck are you talking about!?

                                  You think we can population control ourselves back to a few hundred million people - and do you think handing out condoms will make it happen fast enough to be ANY help at all in the fight for a better environment on Earth?

                                  archaeoiain@archaeo.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                  archaeoiain@archaeo.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                  archaeoiain@archaeo.social
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #96

                                  @jwcph @benroyce @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva and unlike you I am not envisaging people dying, just not being born

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                                    @tuban_muzuru @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva

                                    right so we get our energy from the sun rather than digging it up. vast improvement

                                    tuban_muzuru@beige.partyT This user is from outside of this forum
                                    tuban_muzuru@beige.partyT This user is from outside of this forum
                                    tuban_muzuru@beige.party
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #97

                                    @benroyce @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva

                                    Global warming melted the glaciers and snowmass which filled Lake Mead. They'll never let it disappear completely, but hydro power will soon be gone

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • chuckmcmanis@chaos.socialC chuckmcmanis@chaos.social

                                      @paneerakbari

                                      Yes, but the point of the Oak Ridge demonstration was a nuclear fuel cycle that ran "forever." Not trying to divert this wonderful discussion, just noting that 'nuclear' can be 'renewable' 😃. I too rage against folks who just want to go back to living in caves with 99% of the current population gone.

                                      @benroyce @GhostOnTheHalfShell @anthropy @blogdiva

                                      benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                      benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                      benroyce@mastodon.social
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #98

                                      @ChuckMcManis @paneerakbari @GhostOnTheHalfShell @anthropy @blogdiva

                                      while i generally like breeder reactors you have to admit the teensy tiny problem that this is how we make plutonium for bombs

                                      this is why breeder reactors are downplayed

                                      otherwise i agree

                                      chuckmcmanis@chaos.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • mark@mastodon.fixermark.comM mark@mastodon.fixermark.com

                                        @anthropy @GhostOnTheHalfShell @benroyce @blogdiva I've been ruminating as of late on how close Malthusian nihilism is to racism. This is not to cast aspersions or make accusations regarding thread participants; it's just a thought.

                                        Malthusian math (which is disproven, or at least, claims to prove more than it can because several of its assumptions were upended by new technological breakthroughs) indicates some people have to die or the entire population dies.

                                        But then you're left with the problem that nobody wants to die, and racism steps in to provide a framework that lets people rank the quality of other human beings to let them square that cognitive dissonance off.

                                        It may be an interesting dynamic, but I haven't done nearly enough thinking or research on the subject to endorse it as anything more than a thought.

                                        blogdiva@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                        blogdiva@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                        blogdiva@mastodon.social
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #99

                                        malthusianism is eugenics which is always founded on racism.

                                        if you agree with anything malthusian, i would suggest going into cult deprogramming therapy.

                                        malthusianism ―like eugenics, like racism, like capitalism― is a death cult.

                                        @mark @anthropy @GhostOnTheHalfShell @benroyce

                                        hakona@im.alstadheim.noH miguelpergamon@kolektiva.socialM 2 Replies Last reply
                                        0
                                        • brad@1040ste.netB brad@1040ste.net

                                          @benroyce @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva No argument there; my only quibble was the "get everyone an EV" bit. We can do even better at the same time is all I'm saying.

                                          benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                          benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                          benroyce@mastodon.social
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #100

                                          @brad @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva

                                          but never in a million years did i make this

                                          "get everyone an EV"

                                          argument

                                          replace all ICE with EV

                                          *and* reduce cars in general

                                          this is the ideal argument

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper