Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. One of the top threads on the ClaudeAI subreddit right now: "I am done with this shit" https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1wm5c21/i_am_done_with_this_shit/

One of the top threads on the ClaudeAI subreddit right now: "I am done with this shit" https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1wm5c21/i_am_done_with_this_shit/

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
79 Indlæg 46 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • ahltorp@mastodon.nuA ahltorp@mastodon.nu

    @benroyce @pixelate @emma @cwebber The valid uses for AI are very seldom chatbot-based.

    emma@orbital.horseE This user is from outside of this forum
    emma@orbital.horseE This user is from outside of this forum
    emma@orbital.horse
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #49

    @ahltorp

    The phrase "valid uses" is doing a lot of heavy lifting in that sentence.

    @benroyce@mastodon.social @pixelate @cwebber

    pixelate@tweesecake.socialP 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • npars01@mstdn.socialN npars01@mstdn.social

      @pinhman

      AI is not profitable. The companies lose money each time their product is used.

      The only people making money on this is the financial services sector trading stock & issuing huge loans on "possible, perhaps, maybe" future revenue AND the fossil fuel industry powering gas generators for data centers.

      The product is loathed and user acceptance doesn't match the hype.

      What sane business makes itself dependent on a supplier or vendor at high risk of going bankrupt?

      @cwebber

      dpflug@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
      dpflug@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
      dpflug@hachyderm.io
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #50

      @Npars01
      Last I heard, nvidia were making off like bandits, but otherwise...
      @pinhman @cwebber

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • aequitas@mastodon.gamedev.placeA aequitas@mastodon.gamedev.place

        @cwebber Yup. The human is now the "accountability sink". Someone to blame when the AI fucks something up.

        jmax@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
        jmax@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
        jmax@mastodon.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #51

        @Aequitas @cwebber I myself am searching for a non-gendered alternative to "whipping boy", because that's the most graphic term for the position.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

          @pixelate @emma @cwebber

          i heard an interview about people using AI to reconstruct their voices lost to cancer/ injury/ etc with AI

          https://www.npr.org/2025/07/22/nx-s1-5449081/people-who-have-lost-their-voices-are-using-ai-technology-to-regain-them

          i also think things like protein folding/ cosmology/ etc can benefit from AI

          there are valid uses for AI

          there are also *invalid* uses for AI

          and we have a right to voice that, without confusing the topic with valid uses for AI

          mrfunkedude@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
          mrfunkedude@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
          mrfunkedude@beige.party
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #52

          @benroyce @pixelate @emma @cwebber i’m not going to be surprised if once the bubble pops all of the useful tools that they tried bundling into one package and call it “AI“, becomes their own individual tools.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • alice@lgbtqia.spaceA alice@lgbtqia.space

            @cwebber "you're just a condom between Claude and your production server getting fucked" is the best description of modern software engineering I've read in a while.

            c0debabe@masto.hackers.townC This user is from outside of this forum
            c0debabe@masto.hackers.townC This user is from outside of this forum
            c0debabe@masto.hackers.town
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #53

            @alice @cwebber omg I just cackled

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • emma@orbital.horseE emma@orbital.horse

              @ahltorp

              The phrase "valid uses" is doing a lot of heavy lifting in that sentence.

              @benroyce@mastodon.social @pixelate @cwebber

              pixelate@tweesecake.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
              pixelate@tweesecake.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
              pixelate@tweesecake.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #54

              @emma @ahltorp @cwebber The phrase heavy lifting is doing a lot of heavy lifting in that sentence.

              benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • pixelate@tweesecake.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                pixelate@tweesecake.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                pixelate@tweesecake.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #55

                @Dangerous_beans @thegrumpyenby @cwebber You don't believe the United Nations? What's wrong with *you*? Typical sighted person. Do the work. https://www.un.org/esa/socdev/enable/comp500.htm

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • pixelate@tweesecake.socialP pixelate@tweesecake.social

                  @emma @ahltorp @cwebber The phrase heavy lifting is doing a lot of heavy lifting in that sentence.

                  benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                  benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                  benroyce@mastodon.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #56

                  @pixelate @emma @ahltorp @cwebber

                  Devin:

                  nobody has a problem with the disabled community using AI

                  i celebrate those uses. we celebrate those uses

                  our complaints are about all the uses of AI that harm society

                  you know that. you understand that difference

                  so there is no need to fake a conflict that does not exist

                  pixelate@tweesecake.socialP 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • pixelate@tweesecake.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                    pixelate@tweesecake.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                    pixelate@tweesecake.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #57

                    @Dangerous_beans @thegrumpyenby @cwebber My screen reader read it, thank you.

                    > Whereas the concept of a special regime for certain groups has been developed during the last few years by the UN the human rights and fundamental freedoms of marginalized and vulnerable people remain vastly underserved. Persons with disabilities are often affected by this lack of protection, as many of them suffer double or multiple discrimination, due to their disability, their age and social status, for instance.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                      @pixelate @emma @ahltorp @cwebber

                      Devin:

                      nobody has a problem with the disabled community using AI

                      i celebrate those uses. we celebrate those uses

                      our complaints are about all the uses of AI that harm society

                      you know that. you understand that difference

                      so there is no need to fake a conflict that does not exist

                      pixelate@tweesecake.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                      pixelate@tweesecake.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                      pixelate@tweesecake.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #58

                      @benroyce @emma @ahltorp @cwebber Did you read the part where I simply commented on how I use AI, and some one came at me for it?

                      benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • pixelate@tweesecake.socialP pixelate@tweesecake.social

                        @benroyce @emma @ahltorp @cwebber Did you read the part where I simply commented on how I use AI, and some one came at me for it?

                        benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                        benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                        benroyce@mastodon.social
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #59

                        @pixelate @emma @ahltorp @cwebber

                        what i saw was you defending your use of AI, and not indicating that you do that because you are disabled

                        after their remark, *then* you indicated that

                        that's miscommunication, not malice

                        pixelate@tweesecake.socialP 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                          @pixelate @emma @ahltorp @cwebber

                          what i saw was you defending your use of AI, and not indicating that you do that because you are disabled

                          after their remark, *then* you indicated that

                          that's miscommunication, not malice

                          pixelate@tweesecake.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                          pixelate@tweesecake.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                          pixelate@tweesecake.social
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #60

                          @benroyce @emma @ahltorp @cwebber Wait, are you not seeing the :blind: in my display name?

                          benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • pixelate@tweesecake.socialP pixelate@tweesecake.social

                            @benroyce @emma @ahltorp @cwebber Wait, are you not seeing the :blind: in my display name?

                            benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                            benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                            benroyce@mastodon.social
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #61

                            @pixelate @emma @ahltorp @cwebber

                            yes

                            and you did not in your initial remark indicate you being blind was the reason for your AI use

                            "but that's obvious!"

                            ok. but can we at least say the initial conflict was about defending AI? and that people dislike that? and that if they put in the effort, they might be able to deduce why you are saying what you are saying. but this means the disagreement is simply about miscommunication and not malice?

                            pixelate@tweesecake.socialP 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                              @pixelate @emma @ahltorp @cwebber

                              yes

                              and you did not in your initial remark indicate you being blind was the reason for your AI use

                              "but that's obvious!"

                              ok. but can we at least say the initial conflict was about defending AI? and that people dislike that? and that if they put in the effort, they might be able to deduce why you are saying what you are saying. but this means the disagreement is simply about miscommunication and not malice?

                              pixelate@tweesecake.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                              pixelate@tweesecake.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                              pixelate@tweesecake.social
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #62

                              @benroyce @emma @ahltorp @cwebber Wait that's not obvious? Okay I think this is enough internet for the day, I'm gonna play Magic the Gathering Arena or something. Thank goodness for accessibility mods.

                              benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • alice@lgbtqia.spaceA alice@lgbtqia.space

                                @cwebber "you're just a condom between Claude and your production server getting fucked" is the best description of modern software engineering I've read in a while.

                                linuxandyarn@hachyderm.ioL This user is from outside of this forum
                                linuxandyarn@hachyderm.ioL This user is from outside of this forum
                                linuxandyarn@hachyderm.io
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #63

                                @alice @cwebber If that ever became my job I would just walk away and and let Claude bareback.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • pixelate@tweesecake.socialP pixelate@tweesecake.social

                                  @benroyce @emma @ahltorp @cwebber Wait that's not obvious? Okay I think this is enough internet for the day, I'm gonna play Magic the Gathering Arena or something. Thank goodness for accessibility mods.

                                  benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                  benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                  benroyce@mastodon.social
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #64

                                  @pixelate @emma @ahltorp @cwebber

                                  all i am saying is that the world is a nicer place when you first look to see if there is miscommunication involved first, before seeing malice. there is also malice in the world, of course. but again, the point is to avoid agita

                                  pixelate@tweesecake.socialP 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • lrhodes@merveilles.townL lrhodes@merveilles.town

                                    @cwebber Now if they could extrapolate from this to the fact that Reddit has a $60 million deal to let Google train on user submissions…

                                    benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                    benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                    benroyce@mastodon.social
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #65

                                    @lrhodes @cwebber

                                    it's far worse than that

                                    look at the age of this sub:

                                    https://old.reddit.com/r/SubredditSimulator/

                                    11 years

                                    there are improved models:

                                    https://old.reddit.com/r/SubSimulatorGPT2/

                                    7 years

                                    #reddit is a pioneer in fake #bot engagement

                                    the founders of reddit are on record saying 99% of the first userbase/ comments of reddit were all fakes:

                                    https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/magazines/panache/reddit-faked-its-first-users-resurfaced-video-shows-co-founder-alexis-ohanian-admitting-99-of-early-submissions-were-fabricated/articleshow/119263428.cms

                                    reddit is full of bots. a lot of it is fake

                                    enjoy reddit. i do

                                    but know that you are in a sea of markov chain chatbots -> #GPT

                                    and always have been

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • indigoparadox@mastodon.socialI indigoparadox@mastodon.social

                                      @cwebber I really maintain LLMs are like the microwave. There are some narrow specific uses where it's good, but holy shit we're still in the "True Believers trying to make Thanksgiving dinner with them" phase.

                                      jpaskaruk@growers.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                      jpaskaruk@growers.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                      jpaskaruk@growers.social
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #66

                                      @indigoparadox @cwebber This is it, this is the take. This.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • npars01@mstdn.socialN npars01@mstdn.social

                                        @pinhman

                                        AI is not profitable. The companies lose money each time their product is used.

                                        The only people making money on this is the financial services sector trading stock & issuing huge loans on "possible, perhaps, maybe" future revenue AND the fossil fuel industry powering gas generators for data centers.

                                        The product is loathed and user acceptance doesn't match the hype.

                                        What sane business makes itself dependent on a supplier or vendor at high risk of going bankrupt?

                                        @cwebber

                                        pinhman@humanwords.partyP This user is from outside of this forum
                                        pinhman@humanwords.partyP This user is from outside of this forum
                                        pinhman@humanwords.party
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #67

                                        @Npars01 @cwebber An industry relying on potential bankruptcy? See Canadian agriculture.

                                        It’s gone from family farms that watched out and supported each other, to little corporate agricultural operations waiting for nearby farms to fail, to allow their expansion.

                                        npars01@mstdn.socialN pinhman@humanwords.partyP 2 Replies Last reply
                                        0
                                        • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                                          @pixelate @emma @ahltorp @cwebber

                                          all i am saying is that the world is a nicer place when you first look to see if there is miscommunication involved first, before seeing malice. there is also malice in the world, of course. but again, the point is to avoid agita

                                          pixelate@tweesecake.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                          pixelate@tweesecake.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                          pixelate@tweesecake.social
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #68

                                          @benroyce @emma @ahltorp @cwebber I would like to apologize to everyone on this thread for assuming the worst of people, and adding my fire to an already hot topic.

                                          benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper